Your Managers May Not Be The Problem

When an organization starts having trouble, the managers usually get the blame.

Teams miss deadlines. Communication breaks down. Accountability is uneven. Departments don't work well together. Good employees start leaving.

Executives look at all of that and reach a familiar conclusion: we have a manager problem.

So they invest in training. They bring in coaching. They roll out a new leadership competency model. They have a few hard conversations, and sometimes they replace a manager or two.

Six months later, the same problems are back. Sometimes the faces are new.

That should tell leaders something. Most of the time, it doesn't.

The Most Visible Problem Isn't Always the Source

Managers sit at the point where the organization meets the work. Whatever goes wrong above them, they're the ones who have to deal with it in front of their teams.

So when something breaks, it often shows up first in how managers lead.

But seeing a problem first in one place doesn't mean it started there.

A manager who sends mixed messages may be passing along mixed messages from above. A manager who won't make a decision may have learned that decisions get overturned. A manager who avoids holding people accountable may have watched what happens when accountability is applied unevenly at higher levels.

None of that excuses poor leadership. But if executives stop the diagnosis at the manager level, they may be treating the symptom and missing the disease.

One Struggling Manager Is a Performance Issue. Several Is a Pattern.

If one manager struggles while everyone else in similar roles does well, it's reasonable to look closely at that individual.

But when the same problems show up across departments, under different managers, with different backgrounds and personalities, the explanation gets harder to defend.

Did the organization really hire or promote the wrong person into every one of those roles? Did they all develop the same weaknesses at the same time?

That's possible. It's not likely.

When the same management problems appear throughout an organization, stop treating them as separate individual failures. When something keeps repeating, you're looking at a system.

What Are You Asking Managers to Carry?

Look at what many managers are actually expected to do.

Lead their teams. Produce their own results. Develop their people. Handle conflicts. Explain executive decisions they had no part in making. Keep projects moving. Complete administrative work. Attend meetings that eat up most of the week.

Now add the conditions many of them are working under.

Priorities that change without explanation. Accountability for outcomes they don't have the authority to control. Instructions from different executives that don't line up. Departments measured on their own performance while they're expected to collaborate. New responsibilities added without anything taken away.

Put a capable person in that environment and watch what happens.

They start making safe decisions instead of good ones. They escalate things they should be able to handle themselves. They protect their team's numbers instead of helping the larger organization. They stop developing people because there's no time left to do it.

From the outside, that looks like a manager problem.

From the inside, it looks like a reasonable response to the conditions they've been given.

Training Can't Fix the Environment

This is where many organizations spend money in the wrong place.

Training can build skills. It can help managers communicate more clearly, delegate better, and handle difficult conversations. That has value.

But training sends people back into the same environment they came from.

A manager can learn how to delegate, but if every decision still has to go up the chain for approval, there isn't much to delegate. A manager can learn to hold people accountable, but if executives don't hold each other accountable, the lesson doesn't last long. A manager can learn to coach, but if the job leaves no time for it, coaching becomes one more expectation they can't meet.

You can't train managers to lead consistently inside an organization that operates inconsistently.

When the training doesn't stick, executives often conclude that the managers didn't take it seriously. The more honest conclusion may be that the organization never gave them the conditions to use it.

Diagnose Before You Develop

Before investing in another round of manager development, executives should ask some harder questions:

• Is this problem limited to one or two managers, or does it show up across the organization?

• What do the struggling managers have in common?

• What decisions are they expected to own, and which ones can they actually make?

• What conflicting expectations are they being asked to resolve on their own?

• What happens when a manager uses their own judgment instead of asking permission?

• How much of their week is actually available for leading people?

And then the question that matters most: If you replaced every manager tomorrow, but left the structure, priorities, and decision processes exactly as they are, how long would it take for the same problems to come back?

If the honest answer is "not long," then replacing or retraining managers isn't the solution. It's a delay.

Look Above the Symptom

Managers are still responsible for how they lead. Some of them do need development, and a few may be in the wrong role.

But executives are responsible for the conditions management happens in. Leadership direction, executive alignment, decision rights, workload design, and how the organization is structured all shape what managers can realistically do.

When the same problems keep showing up at the manager level, the most useful thing an executive team can do is look at itself first.

That's an uncomfortable place to start. It's also usually where the answer is.

If you're not sure whether your organization has a manager problem or a problem your managers are absorbing, let's talk. The answer usually becomes clear once you look above the symptoms.

Until next week...

Dr. Neal McIntyre, DPA

---

Dr. Neal McIntyre is the author of Leadership Is Dead: Why Traditional Leadership Is Failing - And What Must Replace It. He works with executives and boards to turn leadership from a concentration risk into a structural advantage. Through his PRISM™ Leadership Continuity Framework, his clients build organizations where leadership transfers, holds, and compounds so that the next transition strengthens the enterprise instead of destabilizing it.