The Illusion of Action: Why Cheap Fixes Are Costly Mistakes in Leadership
- Neal McIntyre
- Oct 3
- 3 min read

In organizations facing real challenges, a familiar pattern emerges: leaders scramble to show they’re “doing something.” But instead of solving the problem, they often settle for the lowest-cost vendor or delegate the issue to internal teams that lack the expertise to fix it. The result? A performance of action that masks inaction—and a cycle of wasted time, money, and morale.
The Minimum Effort Trap
When leaders choose the cheapest solution, they’re not necessarily trying to solve the problem—they’re trying to signal that they’ve responded. It’s a form of organizational theater: hire a vendor, check a box, move on. But the problem remains. Or worse, it festers.
This mindset is rooted in short-term thinking. Leaders fear scrutiny from boards, shareholders, or internal stakeholders, so they prioritize optics over outcomes. They avoid investing in real solutions because those require time, money, and—most threatening of all—change.
A 2023 Gartner report found that up to 20% of enterprise budgets are wasted on ineffective vendor solutions, often chosen for cost over capability. Meanwhile, McKinsey’s research shows that 70% of transformation initiatives fail, largely due to poor leadership and lack of expertise.
The Internal Expertise Illusion
Another common misstep: assigning internal departments to fix problems they helped create. Not out of malice, but because they’re too close to the issue to see it clearly. Proximity breeds blind spots. And without proper training—often withheld to save money—these teams are set up to fail.
Organizations have increasingly decentralized decision-making, empowering frontline employees and local teams. While this shift is necessary in today’s fast-paced environment, it comes with a catch: many of these newly empowered individuals were never trained for leadership or strategic problem-solving. They were handed responsibility without the tools to wield it effectively.
Why? Because training costs money. And many executives, focused on short-term savings, avoid investing in the development their teams desperately need. They know the risks. They just choose to ignore them.
The Ego Barrier
There’s another reason organizations resist external help: ego. Some supervisors fear that bringing in outside experts—or even sending their teams to advanced training—will expose their own limitations. They worry that their subordinates might outshine them. So they cling to outdated programs and familiar vendors, even when those options are ineffective.
This fear-based leadership stifles growth. It prioritizes control over progress. And it creates a culture where mediocrity is tolerated as long as it’s familiar.
Strong Leaders Think Differently
True leadership isn’t about control—it’s about empowerment. It’s not about having all the answers—it’s about knowing when to ask for help.
Strong leaders understand that seeking external expertise is not a sign of weakness. It’s a strategic move. It shows self-awareness, humility, and a commitment to solving problems—not just performing solutions.
They know that real change requires real investment. That the cheapest option is often the most expensive in the long run. That empowering teams means equipping them—not just assigning them tasks.
They also understand that leadership is not a solo act. It’s a collective endeavor. The best leaders are facilitators, not dictators. They elevate their teams, ask strategic questions, and create environments where innovation thrives.
The Cost of Doing the Least
Organizations that prioritize short-term optics over long-term strategy pay a steep price. They suffer from high turnover, low engagement, and persistent problems that never get solved. They become reactive instead of proactive. And they lose their competitive edge.
The illusion of action is seductive. It’s easy. It’s cheap. But it’s also dangerous.
The Way Forward
If your organization is stuck in a cycle of ineffective fixes and superficial solutions, it’s time to rethink your approach:
Stop choosing vendors based on price alone. Choose based on capability, track record, and alignment with your goals.
Stop assigning problems to teams without giving them the tools to succeed. Invest in training, development, and support.
Stop fearing external help. Start seeing it as a strategic advantage.
Leadership isn’t about doing the least to say you did something. It’s about doing what’s necessary—even when it’s hard, expensive, or uncomfortable.
The strongest leaders aren’t afraid to admit what they don’t know. They’re not threatened by expertise. They seek it out. They build teams that challenge them. And they measure success not by how much they control, but by how much they empower.
Comments